Commencement 2018 Pictures are in!Read More
Welcome to the Colin Powell School for Civic and Global Leadership
Tell me if this sounds familiar: the leadership of a distant nation has its own ideas about whom you should vote for, or who should rule your country, and acts decisively on them, affecting an election. Such interference in the political life of another country must be a reference to... no, I’m not thinking about Vladimir Putin and the American election of 2016, but perhaps the Italian election of 1948, or the Japanese election of 1958, or the Nicaraguan election of 1990 -- all ones in which the U.S. had a significant hand and affected the outcome. Or what about an even cruder scenario than just handing over suitcases of cash to those you support or producing “fake news” to influence another country’s voting behavior? How about just overthrowing an already elected democratic government you find distasteful and installing one more to your liking, as in Iran in 1953, Guatemala in 1954, or Chile in 1973? Read more
Amid apparent snubs in Asia, Obama 'doesn’t have any leverage' left but can lay groundwork for Clinton
The following article was originally run by http://www.cbc.ca/; written by Matt Kwong, Reporter
Spare a thought for U.S. President Barack Obama. Being commander in chief isn't what it used to be.
It's hard to say when, over the course of his second term, Obama changed from lion of democracy abroad to a lame-duck head of state. To scholars on presidential powers, though, a level of perceived discourtesy afforded to him during last week's G20 summit in Asia was the clearest sign yet that his global authority is waning.